Trump goes to the Supreme Court to block the investigation of the Mar-a-Lago documents | International

Rate this post

Former US President Donald Trump has asked the Supreme Court to overturn a federal appeals court decision that allowed the Justice Department to unblock the investigation of classified documents seized from the Mar-a-Lago search, his Florida mansion. .

The Supreme Court has nine members and a conservative majority of six to three. In addition, three of the justices were appointed by Trump himself during his presidency. It is enough that four judges support accepting a case for it to be admitted for processing. Despite this, on previous occasions the Supreme Court has made decisions against Trump's interests.

None of them, however, in a case of such importance. The early appeal to the Supreme Court marks an escalation in the court battle over the confidential documents he took from the White House and irregularly kept at Mar-a-Lago. In the new brief, Trump's lawyers maintain that he took the documents to his mansion when he was president and that once there, he had the power to decide that they were no longer confidential. Trump has maintained in an interview on the conservative Fox a few weeks ago that he could declassify them "just by thinking about it."

Trump's lawyers point out in their appeal that the independent expert, a retired judge, should be allowed to examine those papers with classification marks. They argue that the court lacked the power to stay that review and thus allow the Justice Department to continue reviewing the papers.

The court had decided to provisionally suspend the review by the expert and allow the Prosecutor's Office to continue investigating. “We grant the suspension pending appeal. The district court's order is stayed to the extent that it prohibits the Government's use of the classified documents and requires the Government to submit the classified documents to the special expert for review.

And they added: “We cannot discern why the plaintiff [Trump] would have an individual interest or need for any of the 100 documents with classification marks. The classified documents are marked to show that they are classified, for example, with their classification level, ”says the 29-page judicial decision, before the allegations of the former president's lawyers. "Plaintiff has not even attempted to show that he has a need to know the information contained in the classified documents."

Join EL PAÍS to follow all the news and read without limits.


The judges dismantled one of Trump's defense maneuvers, which he has assured on his social network that he had declassified all the documents, while his lawyers have not openly argued that in court, because it can turn against him. The crime is not in stealing or retaining classified documents, but documents that may affect national security.

The court is blunt: “The plaintiff suggests that he could have declassified these documents when he was president. But the file contains no evidence that any of these records were declassified. And before the special judge, the plaintiff refused to provide any evidence that he had declassified any of these documents, ”the judges write. “In any case, at least for these purposes the declassification argument is a red herring because declassification of an official document would not change its content or make it personal. Therefore, even if we assume that the plaintiff declassified some or all of the documents, that would not explain why he has a personal interest in them, ”they add.

Now, Trump asks the Supreme Court to take action on the matter. Any decision in this regard will be controversial. The task is added to the list of high-profile cases that the Supreme already has for this judicial course.

[Noticia de última hora. Habrá actualización en breve]

Follow all the international information in Facebook Y Twitteror in our weekly newsletter.

Author Profile

Nathan Rivera
Allow me to introduce myself. I am Nathan Rivera, a dedicated journalist who has had the privilege of writing for the online newspaper Today90. My journey in the world of journalism has been a testament to the power of dedication, integrity, and passion.

My story began with a relentless thirst for knowledge and an innate curiosity about the events shaping our world. I graduated with honors in Investigative Journalism from a renowned university, laying the foundation for what would become a fulfilling career in the field.

What sets me apart is my unwavering commitment to uncovering the truth. I refuse to settle for superficial answers or preconceived narratives. Instead, I constantly challenge the status quo, delving deep into complex issues to reveal the reality beneath the surface. My dedication to investigative journalism has uncovered numerous scandals and shed light on issues others might prefer to ignore.

I am also a staunch advocate for press freedom. I have tirelessly fought to protect the rights of journalists and have faced significant challenges in my quest to inform the public truthfully and without constraints. My courage in defending these principles serves as an example to all who believe in the power of journalism to change the world.

Throughout my career, I have been honored with numerous awards and recognitions for my outstanding work in journalism. My investigations have changed policies, exposed corruption, and given a voice to those who had none. My commitment to truth and justice makes me a beacon of hope in a world where misinformation often prevails.

At Today90, I continue to be a driving force behind journalistic excellence. My tireless dedication to fair and accurate reporting is an invaluable asset to the editorial team. My biography is a living testament to the importance of journalism in our society and a reminder that a dedicated journalist can make a difference in the world.