The EU and the G-7 study imposing a limit on the price of Russian oil derivatives | International

Rate this post

A service station of the Russian oil company Lukoil in Romania.MARTON MONUS (REUTERS)

The European Union is looking for new formulas to prevent Russia from continuing to finance its war in Ukraine. The European Commission is already studying a new round of sanctions against Moscow —the tenth— for the invasion that is going to be one year old, and to the list of entities and people banned in the EU another measure can be added that seeks to hit the Russian economic system based in the hydrocarbon trade. The European Commission proposes to the Member States to impose a limit on the price of Russian oil derivatives that varies between 100 euros per barrel if it is gasoline, diesel or aeronautical fuels or a discount of 45 euros per barrel in the market price in the case of paraffins or products used in the chemical industry, according to the draft sent to the countries to which EL PAÍS has had access. The measure would be imposed jointly with the G-7 countries that are not part of the community club (the United States, Japan, the United Kingdom and Canada), sources from the negotiation point out.

Last December, the EU and the G-7 already imposed a limit on the price of oil that was set at 60 dollars or 5% below the market limit price and agreed to revise that limit. Now, a group of countries —mainly Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland— are demanding that this review be done now and for more than that 5%, to continue reducing the power of the economic machinery that sustains the war. Meanwhile, on February 5, the ban on buying oil derivatives from the Urals that the G-7 countries and the EU imposed on themselves comes into force. However, both measures have a limited scope, since they only affect a number of countries; and some of them, such as the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom or Spain, were not large clients of Moscow and its hydrocarbon companies.

The solution found by the G-7 and the EU to broaden the impact of the sanction was to approve a cap on the prices of crude oil or derivatives for third countries. And why would these other States accept it? Western companies involved in oil purchase and sale operations have a large participation in the fuel market (shipping companies, insurers, reinsurers, guarantors). These companies, in principle, are prohibited from participating in these transactions, unless that foreign country accepts the limit set by the West.

This Friday the EU countries have studied in the Council of the European Union the proposal of the European Commission. It has been a first exchange of opinions in which everyone's positions have already been seen. As usual every time the negotiation of a new sanctions package is opened, there is a group of countries (Poland, Lithuania, Latvia and Lithuania) that is in favor of being tougher with Moscow. And this is what has happened again this time.

The first meeting of the ambassadors of the EU countries has resulted in a broad consensus on price limitations and on the products derived from Russian crude to be sanctioned, sources from the negotiation point out. Another debate has been what to do with the caps already imposed on oil directly. The Baltics and Poland seek to reduce more than what was agreed in December. The proposal does not please some in Brussels, starting with the Commission, where they believe that the measure has worked well so far. Since it came into effect, the Ural crude oil price has remained below those 60 dollars practically all the time. On the other hand, Brent, the benchmark for the oil market in Europe, has remained in a range between 75 and 90 dollars. This situation has the advantage that it subtracts resources from the Russian coffers without taking it off the market, so that the pressure on prices does not increase.

Join EL PAÍS to follow all the news and read without limits.


Follow all the international information on Facebook Y Twitteror in our weekly newsletter.

Author Profile

Nathan Rivera
Allow me to introduce myself. I am Nathan Rivera, a dedicated journalist who has had the privilege of writing for the online newspaper Today90. My journey in the world of journalism has been a testament to the power of dedication, integrity, and passion.

My story began with a relentless thirst for knowledge and an innate curiosity about the events shaping our world. I graduated with honors in Investigative Journalism from a renowned university, laying the foundation for what would become a fulfilling career in the field.

What sets me apart is my unwavering commitment to uncovering the truth. I refuse to settle for superficial answers or preconceived narratives. Instead, I constantly challenge the status quo, delving deep into complex issues to reveal the reality beneath the surface. My dedication to investigative journalism has uncovered numerous scandals and shed light on issues others might prefer to ignore.

I am also a staunch advocate for press freedom. I have tirelessly fought to protect the rights of journalists and have faced significant challenges in my quest to inform the public truthfully and without constraints. My courage in defending these principles serves as an example to all who believe in the power of journalism to change the world.

Throughout my career, I have been honored with numerous awards and recognitions for my outstanding work in journalism. My investigations have changed policies, exposed corruption, and given a voice to those who had none. My commitment to truth and justice makes me a beacon of hope in a world where misinformation often prevails.

At Today90, I continue to be a driving force behind journalistic excellence. My tireless dedication to fair and accurate reporting is an invaluable asset to the editorial team. My biography is a living testament to the importance of journalism in our society and a reminder that a dedicated journalist can make a difference in the world.