Sixty merchants were evicted in the Izcalli Market: they accuse abuse of authority

In it Izcalli Market in Tepalcapa, approximately 60 commercial premises were evicted in an action carried out by a group of individuals accompanied by municipal police officers. The merchandise of these merchants was removed and transferred to Tonatico street, in the neighborhood Tepalcapa.

The decision of this eviction, which raised complaints in the local community, is based on an alleged order by a judge in the context of a legal dispute over possession of these premises. An actuary with accreditation from the Judiciary of the State of Mexico (PJEM) endorsed the operation, which has heightened concerns and questions regarding the legality and transparency of the process.

The official version maintains that the eviction was carried out following a court order, however, the business community affected claims not to have been previously notified of this measure.

This lack of notice left merchants at a disadvantage, as many did not have sufficient time to salvage their merchandise before the eviction would take place.

In response to the operation, some merchants chose to take the initiative and remove their products and furniture from the premises themselves, in an attempt to avoid their confiscation. This abrupt eviction not only disrupted regular operations at Mercado Izcalli, but also created a sense of fear and concern among both the merchants and customers present in the venue.

Despite the official version that argues a court order, the lack of prior notification and the manner in which the eviction was carried out have raised questions about the legitimacy and procedure of this operation. The concern has spread through the community, fueling the debate about whether the proper protocols were followed and whether the rights of those affected were respected.

Uncertainty now revolves around the actions that the affected merchants in response to this situation. The eviction also had a direct impact on the routine of the regular customers of the Izcalli Market.

The unexpected interruption of business operations left many of them worried about the future of the businesses that were evicted. The uncertainty about how this event will affect local businesses and the community in general in the long term adds an element of concern to the situation.

Evictions can be the result of a variety of reasons, from non-payment to legal disputes over ownership of property. However, transparency and fair execution of these processes are essential to avoid the confusion and discontent surrounding the eviction in Mercado Izcalli.

In Mexico, the owners must follow the housing eviction law present in the current criminal and civil code. This law obliges landlords to give their tenants advance notice of 90 days before eviction. The owner must give the tenant a notice to achieve the eviction of the property at least 3 months in advance.

The notice usually includes the date the tenant must vacate the property, the reason for the eviction and the contact details of the landlord. It is important to note that even if the tenant does not sign the eviction notice, it is still legally binding on the tenant.

If the tenant does not leave the apartment after being notified in writing, a legal action can be started by filing a complaint in court or tribunal. A summons must be served on the tenant and a copy of the complaint. You must bear in mind that these processes must be paid, so you will have some extra expenses.

If the landlord and tenant do not reach an agreement, they can go to court. Obviously, it is not the most recommended option for either of the 2 parties, since time and money are invested.